Ministerio de Hacienda y Administraciones Públicas

Agencia de evaluación y calidad

Smaller text size Normal text size Larger text size
Buscador Aeval

Evaluation codes

Public policy evaluation is generally subject to various forms of self-regulation. In different countries and organisations, evaluation adopts rules and precepts generically termed "codes".

The first approved evaluation code was issued by the United States Joint Committee for Educational Evaluation in 1981 (with an update in 1994), and has remained a widely influential historic benchmark.

Codes are also commonly termed “principles”, “standards” and "guidelines”. Each term has slightly different nuances:

- Principles: Principles concern both the conduct of evaluators and the attributes (specified in less detail than in standards) to which an evaluation must conform. This is the term used by the United States and French evaluation societies and by the OECD.

- Standards: These documents state the specifications a good evaluation should meet. Standards are more detailed than principles. This is the term used by the Joint Committee, the German and Swiss evaluation societies and the UN.

- Guidelines: These are prescriptions on how to comply with principles and standards. This is the term used by the evaluation societies of Italy, the United Kingdom, Canada, African countries, Australasian countries, and the United National Development Programme (UNDP).

Besides its own evaluation standards, the UN also uses documents termed “norms”, such as Norms for Evaluation in the UN System, 2005.

Some of the major current evaluation codes are:

European evaluation societies

- Guidelines for Good Practice in Evaluation. United Kingdom Evaluation Society. United Kingdom. 2003

- Evaluation Standards. German Evaluation Society (Degeval). Germany. 2001.

- Evaluation Standards. Swiss Evaluation Society. Switzerland. 2001

- Linee Guida per un Codice Deontologico del Valutatore. Associazione Italiana di Valutazione. Italy.

- La Charte de l´évaluation des politiques publiques et des programmes publics. Société française de l’évaluation. France. 2006.

Other countries’ evaluation societies

- Guidelines for the Ethical Conduct of Evaluations. 2002. Code of Ethics. 2000. Australasian Evaluation Society. Australia-New Zealand


- The African Evaluation Guidelines. African Evaluation Association. Several countries. 2002


- Guidelines for Ethical Conduct /Lignes directrices de la SEÉ en matière d’éthique. Canadian Evaluation Society. 1996


- Guiding Principles for Evaluators. American Evaluation Association. United States. 2004


- Program Evaluation Standards. 1994. Personnel Evaluation Standards. 1988. Joint Committee for Educational Evaluation. Western Michigan University. United States
Michigan University. EE.UU.

Institutions

- Evaluating EU Activities: A Practical Guide for the Commission Services. Comisión Europea. Dirección General de Presupuestos. 2004

- Review of the DAC[1] Principles for Evaluation of Development Assistance. 1998. DAC Evaluation Quality Standards (test phase) 2006.OCDE

- Norms for Evaluation in the UN System. ONU. 2005. Standards for Evaluation in the UN System United Nations Evaluation Group. ONU.2005



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[1]Development Assistance Committee. OCDE

Información relacionada

Contacto

DEPARTAMENTO DE EVALUACIÓN

C/Príncipe de Vergara, 108, 2ª Planta
28002 Madrid
Teléfono: 91 2732871
Fax. (+34) 91 4114171
evaluacion@aeval.es  


Agencia Estatal de Evaluación de las Políticas Públicas y la Calidad de los Servicios